This morning I finished the history of Russia. Definitely an engrossing read, especially for someone who has really only ever had Russia mentioned in history class in relation to US history. It was published in 2012 and deals with events right up to present day. It was a fun read. The author mixes events, commentary, and anecdotes well, and gives a good coloring of culture and technology in addition to the political aspects. It paints a portrait of a culture that is constructing itself as a blend of eastern and western cultures, with its own uniquely Russian base. It is able to paint a vivid enough picture as to convince me to travel there if possible.
The book is a history of Russia, but it is a history constructed to answer the question "Can/should Russia transform itself into a western-style democracy?" From the beginning the book is peppered with comments indicating that such-and-such an event was another missed chance for western-style democracy. In the end he arrives at the conclusion that 'It is a beguiling thought [that incorporating into the modern international trade system would force Russia to westernize], but it is not supported by the facts." Furthermore, "International trade links seemed not to have persuaded russia to act like a European country, but to have convinced her that she can act as she likes." The book successfully argues this case, and I do not have enough background from other sources to judge whether that is off base or not.
I was listening to Tchaikovsky's 5th and 6th symphonies as I finished this; it felt appropriate. There is one part in the 5th symphony that sounds as though it was the inspiration for part of the rhapsody in August Rush. I'll go back and try to figure out the exact point.
No comments:
Post a Comment